| 1 | <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN"> |
|---|
| 2 | <HTML> |
|---|
| 3 | <HEAD> |
|---|
| 4 | <TITLE>dnapenny</TITLE> |
|---|
| 5 | <META NAME="description" CONTENT="dnapenny"> |
|---|
| 6 | <META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="dnapenny"> |
|---|
| 7 | <META NAME="resource-type" CONTENT="document"> |
|---|
| 8 | <META NAME="distribution" CONTENT="global"> |
|---|
| 9 | <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> |
|---|
| 10 | </HEAD> |
|---|
| 11 | <BODY BGCOLOR="#ccffff"> |
|---|
| 12 | <DIV ALIGN=RIGHT> |
|---|
| 13 | version 3.6 |
|---|
| 14 | </DIV> |
|---|
| 15 | <P> |
|---|
| 16 | <DIV ALIGN=CENTER> |
|---|
| 17 | <H1>DNAPENNY - Branch and bound to find<BR> |
|---|
| 18 | all most parsimonious trees<BR> |
|---|
| 19 | for nucleic acid sequence parsimony criteria</H1> |
|---|
| 20 | </DIV> |
|---|
| 21 | <P> |
|---|
| 22 | © Copyright 1986-2002 by The University of |
|---|
| 23 | Washington. Written by Joseph Felsenstein. Permission is granted to copy |
|---|
| 24 | this document provided that no fee is charged for it and that this copyright |
|---|
| 25 | notice is not removed. |
|---|
| 26 | <P> |
|---|
| 27 | DNAPENNY is a program that will find all of the most parsimonious trees |
|---|
| 28 | implied by your data when the nucleic acid sequence parsimony criterion is |
|---|
| 29 | employed. It does so not by examining all possible trees, |
|---|
| 30 | but by using the more sophisticated "branch and bound" algorithm, a |
|---|
| 31 | standard computer science search strategy first applied to |
|---|
| 32 | phylogenetic inference by Hendy and Penny (1982). (J. S. Farris |
|---|
| 33 | [personal communication, 1975] had also suggested that this strategy, |
|---|
| 34 | which is well-known in computer science, might |
|---|
| 35 | be applied to phylogenies, but he did not publish this suggestion). |
|---|
| 36 | <P> |
|---|
| 37 | There is, however, a price to be paid for the certainty that one has |
|---|
| 38 | found all members of the set of most parsimonious trees. The problem of |
|---|
| 39 | finding these has been shown (Graham and Foulds, 1982; Day, 1983) to be |
|---|
| 40 | NP-complete, which is equivalent to saying that there is no |
|---|
| 41 | fast algorithm that is guaranteed to solve the problem in all cases |
|---|
| 42 | (for a discussion of NP-completeness, see the Scientific American |
|---|
| 43 | article by Lewis and Papadimitriou, 1978). The result is that this program, |
|---|
| 44 | despite its algorithmic sophistication, is VERY SLOW. |
|---|
| 45 | <P> |
|---|
| 46 | The program should be slower than the other tree-building programs |
|---|
| 47 | in the package, but useable up to about ten species. Above this it will |
|---|
| 48 | bog down rapidly, but exactly when depends on the data and on how much |
|---|
| 49 | computer time you have (it may be more effective in the hands of someone |
|---|
| 50 | who can let a microcomputer grind all night than for someone who |
|---|
| 51 | has the "benefit" of paying for time on the campus mainframe computer). IT |
|---|
| 52 | IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO GET A FEEL FOR HOW LONG THE PROGRAM |
|---|
| 53 | WILL TAKE ON YOUR DATA. This can be done by running it on subsets |
|---|
| 54 | of the species, increasing the number of species in the run until you |
|---|
| 55 | either are able to treat the full data set or know that the program |
|---|
| 56 | will take unacceptably long on it. (Making a plot of the logarithm of |
|---|
| 57 | run time against species number may help to project run times). |
|---|
| 58 | <P> |
|---|
| 59 | <H2>The Algorithm</H2> |
|---|
| 60 | <P> |
|---|
| 61 | The search strategy used by DNAPENNY starts by making a tree consisting of the |
|---|
| 62 | first two species (the first three if the tree is to be unrooted). Then |
|---|
| 63 | it tries to add the next species in all possible places (there are three |
|---|
| 64 | of these). For each of the resulting trees it evaluates the number of |
|---|
| 65 | base substitutions. It adds the next species to each of these, again in all |
|---|
| 66 | possible spaces. If this process would continue it would simply |
|---|
| 67 | generate all possible trees, of which there are a very large number even |
|---|
| 68 | when the number of species is moderate (34,459,425 with 10 species). Actually |
|---|
| 69 | it does not do this, because the trees are generated in a |
|---|
| 70 | particular order and some of them are never generated. |
|---|
| 71 | <P> |
|---|
| 72 | This is because the order in which trees are generated is not quite as implied |
|---|
| 73 | above, but is a "depth-first search". This means that first one adds the third |
|---|
| 74 | species in the first possible place, then the fourth species in its first |
|---|
| 75 | possible place, then the fifth and so on until the first possible tree has |
|---|
| 76 | been produced. For each tree the number of steps is evaluated. Then one |
|---|
| 77 | "backtracks" by trying the alternative placements of the last species. When |
|---|
| 78 | these are exhausted one tries the next placement of the next-to-last |
|---|
| 79 | species. The order of placement in a depth-first search is like this for a |
|---|
| 80 | four-species case (parentheses enclose monophyletic groups): |
|---|
| 81 | <P> |
|---|
| 82 | Make tree of first two species: (A,B)<BR> |
|---|
| 83 | Add C in first place: ((A,B),C)<BR> |
|---|
| 84 | Add D in first place: (((A,D),B),C)<BR> |
|---|
| 85 | Add D in second place: ((A,(B,D)),C)<BR> |
|---|
| 86 | Add D in third place: (((A,B),D),C)<BR> |
|---|
| 87 | Add D in fourth place: ((A,B),(C,D))<BR> |
|---|
| 88 | Add D in fifth place: (((A,B),C),D)<BR> |
|---|
| 89 | Add C in second place: ((A,C),B)<BR> |
|---|
| 90 | Add D in first place: (((A,D),C),B)<BR> |
|---|
| 91 | Add D in second place: ((A,(C,D)),B)<BR> |
|---|
| 92 | Add D in third place: (((A,C),D),B)<BR> |
|---|
| 93 | Add D in fourth place: ((A,C),(B,D))<BR> |
|---|
| 94 | Add D in fifth place: (((A,C),B),D)<BR> |
|---|
| 95 | Add C in third place: (A,(B,C))<BR> |
|---|
| 96 | Add D in first place: ((A,D),(B,C))<BR> |
|---|
| 97 | Add D in second place: (A,((B,D),C))<BR> |
|---|
| 98 | Add D in third place: (A,(B,(C,D)))<BR> |
|---|
| 99 | Add D in fourth place: (A,((B,C),D))<BR> |
|---|
| 100 | Add D in fifth place: ((A,(B,C)),D)<BR> |
|---|
| 101 | <P> |
|---|
| 102 | Among these fifteen trees you will find all of the four-species |
|---|
| 103 | rooted trees, each exactly once (the parentheses each enclose |
|---|
| 104 | a monophyletic group). As displayed above, the backtracking |
|---|
| 105 | depth-first search algorithm is just another way of producing all |
|---|
| 106 | possible trees one at a time. The branch and bound algorithm |
|---|
| 107 | consists of this with one change. As each tree is constructed, |
|---|
| 108 | including the partial trees such as (A,(B,C)), its number of steps |
|---|
| 109 | is evaluated. In addition a prediction is made as to how many |
|---|
| 110 | steps will be added, at a minimum, as further species are added. |
|---|
| 111 | <P> |
|---|
| 112 | This is done by counting how many sites which are invariant in the data up the |
|---|
| 113 | most recent species added will ultimately show variation when further species |
|---|
| 114 | are added. Thus if 20 sites vary among species A, B, and C and their root, |
|---|
| 115 | and if tree ((A,C),B) requires 24 steps, then if there are 8 more sites which |
|---|
| 116 | will be seen to vary when species D is added, we can immediately say that no |
|---|
| 117 | matter how we add D, the resulting tree can have no less than 24 + 8 = 32 |
|---|
| 118 | steps. The point of all this is that if a previously-found tree such as |
|---|
| 119 | ((A,B),(C,D)) required only 30 steps, then we know that there is no point in |
|---|
| 120 | even trying to add D to ((A,C),B). We have computed the bound that enables us |
|---|
| 121 | to cut off a whole line of inquiry (in this case five trees) and avoid going |
|---|
| 122 | down that particular branch any farther. |
|---|
| 123 | <P> |
|---|
| 124 | The branch-and-bound algorithm thus allows us to find all most parsimonious |
|---|
| 125 | trees without generating all possible trees. How much of a saving this |
|---|
| 126 | is depends strongly on the data. For very clean (nearly "Hennigian") |
|---|
| 127 | data, it saves much time, but on very messy data it will still take |
|---|
| 128 | a very long time. |
|---|
| 129 | <P> |
|---|
| 130 | The algorithm in the program differs from the one outlined here |
|---|
| 131 | in some essential details: it investigates possibilities in the |
|---|
| 132 | order of their apparent promise. This applies to the order of addition |
|---|
| 133 | of species, and to the places where they are added to the tree. After |
|---|
| 134 | the first two-species tree is constructed, the program tries adding |
|---|
| 135 | each of the remaining species in turn, each in the best possible place it |
|---|
| 136 | can find. Whichever of those species adds (at a minimum) the most |
|---|
| 137 | additional steps is taken to be the one to be added next to the tree. When |
|---|
| 138 | it is added, it is added in turn to places which cause the fewest |
|---|
| 139 | additional steps to be added. This sounds a bit complex, but it is done |
|---|
| 140 | with the intention of eliminating regions of the search of all possible |
|---|
| 141 | trees as soon as possible, and lowering the bound on tree length as quickly |
|---|
| 142 | as possible. This process of evaluating which species to add in which |
|---|
| 143 | order goes on the first time the search makes a tree; thereafter it uses that |
|---|
| 144 | order. |
|---|
| 145 | <P> |
|---|
| 146 | The program keeps a list of all the most parsimonious |
|---|
| 147 | trees found so far. Whenever it finds one that has fewer losses than |
|---|
| 148 | these, it clears out the list and |
|---|
| 149 | restarts it with that tree. In the process the bound tightens and |
|---|
| 150 | fewer possibilities need be investigated. At the end the list contains |
|---|
| 151 | all the shortest trees. These are then printed out. It should be |
|---|
| 152 | mentioned that the program CLIQUE for finding all largest cliques |
|---|
| 153 | also works by branch-and-bound. Both problems are NP-complete but for |
|---|
| 154 | some reason CLIQUE runs far faster. Although their worst-case behavior |
|---|
| 155 | is bad for both programs, those worst cases occur far more frequently |
|---|
| 156 | in parsimony problems than in compatibility problems. |
|---|
| 157 | <P> |
|---|
| 158 | <H2>Controlling Run Times</H2> |
|---|
| 159 | <P> |
|---|
| 160 | Among the quantities available to be set from the menu of |
|---|
| 161 | DNAPENNY, two (howoften and howmany) are of particular |
|---|
| 162 | importance. As DNAPENNY goes along it will keep count of how many |
|---|
| 163 | trees it has examined. Suppose that howoften is 100 and howmany is 1000, |
|---|
| 164 | the default settings. Every time 100 trees have been examined, DNAPENNY |
|---|
| 165 | will print out a line saying how many multiples of 100 trees have now been |
|---|
| 166 | examined, how many steps the most parsimonious tree found so far has, |
|---|
| 167 | how many trees of with that number of steps have been found, and a very |
|---|
| 168 | rough estimate of what fraction of all trees have been looked at so far. |
|---|
| 169 | <P> |
|---|
| 170 | When the number of these multiples printed out reaches the number howmany |
|---|
| 171 | (say 1000), the whole algorithm aborts and prints out that it has not |
|---|
| 172 | found all most parsimonious trees, but prints out what is has got so far |
|---|
| 173 | anyway. These trees need not be any of the most parsimonious trees: they are |
|---|
| 174 | simply the most parsimonious ones found so far. By setting the product |
|---|
| 175 | (howoften times howmany) large you can make |
|---|
| 176 | the algorithm less likely to abort, but then you risk getting bogged |
|---|
| 177 | down in a gigantic computation. You should adjust these constants so that |
|---|
| 178 | the program cannot go beyond examining the number of trees you are reasonably |
|---|
| 179 | willing to pay for (or wait for). In their initial setting the program will |
|---|
| 180 | abort after looking at 100,000 trees. Obviously you may want to adjust |
|---|
| 181 | howoften in order to get more or fewer lines of intermediate notice of how |
|---|
| 182 | many trees have been looked at so far. Of course, in small cases you may |
|---|
| 183 | never even reach the first multiple of howoften, and nothing will be printed |
|---|
| 184 | out except some headings and then the final trees. |
|---|
| 185 | <P> |
|---|
| 186 | The indication of the approximate percentage of trees searched so far will |
|---|
| 187 | be helpful in judging how much farther you would have to go to get the full |
|---|
| 188 | search. Actually, since that fraction is the fraction of the set of all |
|---|
| 189 | possible trees searched or ruled out so far, and since the search becomes |
|---|
| 190 | progressively more efficient, the approximate fraction printed out will |
|---|
| 191 | usually be an underestimate of how far along the program is, sometimes a |
|---|
| 192 | serious underestimate. |
|---|
| 193 | <P> |
|---|
| 194 | A constant |
|---|
| 195 | at the beginning of the program that affects the result is |
|---|
| 196 | "maxtrees", |
|---|
| 197 | which controls the |
|---|
| 198 | maximum number of trees that can be stored. Thus if maxtrees is 25, |
|---|
| 199 | and 32 most parsimonious trees are found, only the first 25 of these are |
|---|
| 200 | stored and printed out. If maxtrees is increased, the program does not |
|---|
| 201 | run any slower but requires a little |
|---|
| 202 | more intermediate storage space. I recommend |
|---|
| 203 | that maxtrees be kept as large as you can, provided you are willing to |
|---|
| 204 | look at an output with that many trees on it! Initially, maxtrees is set |
|---|
| 205 | to 100 in the distribution copy. |
|---|
| 206 | <P> |
|---|
| 207 | <H2>Method and Options</H2> |
|---|
| 208 | <P> |
|---|
| 209 | The counting of the length of trees is done by an algorithm nearly |
|---|
| 210 | identical to the corresponding algorithms in DNAPARS, and thus the remainder |
|---|
| 211 | of this document will be nearly identical to the DNAPARS document. |
|---|
| 212 | <P> |
|---|
| 213 | This program carries out unrooted parsimony (analogous to Wagner |
|---|
| 214 | trees) (Eck and Dayhoff, 1966; Kluge and Farris, 1969) on DNA |
|---|
| 215 | sequences. The method of Fitch (1971) is used to count the number of |
|---|
| 216 | changes of base needed on a given tree. The assumptions of this |
|---|
| 217 | method are exactly analogous to those of DNAPARS: |
|---|
| 218 | <OL> |
|---|
| 219 | <LI>Each site evolves independently. |
|---|
| 220 | <LI>Different lineages evolve independently. |
|---|
| 221 | <LI>The probability of a base substitution at a given site is |
|---|
| 222 | small over the lengths of time involved in |
|---|
| 223 | a branch of the phylogeny. |
|---|
| 224 | <LI>The expected amounts of change in different branches of the phylogeny |
|---|
| 225 | do not vary by so much that two changes in a high-rate branch |
|---|
| 226 | are more probable than one change in a low-rate branch. |
|---|
| 227 | <LI>The expected amounts of change do not vary enough among sites that two |
|---|
| 228 | changes in one site are more probable than one change in another. |
|---|
| 229 | </OL> |
|---|
| 230 | <P> |
|---|
| 231 | Change from an occupied site to a deletion is counted as one |
|---|
| 232 | change. Reversion from a deletion to an occupied site is allowed and is also |
|---|
| 233 | counted as one change. |
|---|
| 234 | <P> |
|---|
| 235 | That these are the assumptions of parsimony methods has been documented |
|---|
| 236 | in a series of papers of mine: (1973a, 1978b, 1979, 1981b, |
|---|
| 237 | 1983b, 1988b). For an |
|---|
| 238 | opposing view arguing that the parsimony methods make no substantive |
|---|
| 239 | assumptions such as these, see the papers by Farris (1983) and Sober (1983a, |
|---|
| 240 | 1983b), but also read the exchange between Felsenstein and Sober (1986). |
|---|
| 241 | <P> |
|---|
| 242 | Change from an occupied site to a deletion is counted as one |
|---|
| 243 | change. Reversion from a deletion to an occupied site is allowed and is also |
|---|
| 244 | counted as one change. Note that this in effect assumes that a deletion |
|---|
| 245 | N bases long is N separate events. |
|---|
| 246 | <P> |
|---|
| 247 | The input data is standard. The first line of the input file contains the |
|---|
| 248 | number of species and the number of sites. If the Weights option is being |
|---|
| 249 | used, there must also be a W in this first line to signal its presence. |
|---|
| 250 | There are only two options requiring information to be present in the input |
|---|
| 251 | file, W (Weights) and U (User tree). All options other than W (including U) are |
|---|
| 252 | invoked using the menu. |
|---|
| 253 | <P> |
|---|
| 254 | Next come the species data. Each |
|---|
| 255 | sequence starts on a new line, has a ten-character species name |
|---|
| 256 | that must be blank-filled to be of that length, followed immediately |
|---|
| 257 | by the species data in the one-letter code. The sequences must either |
|---|
| 258 | be in the "interleaved" or "sequential" formats |
|---|
| 259 | described in the Molecular Sequence Programs document. The I option |
|---|
| 260 | selects between them. The sequences can have internal |
|---|
| 261 | blanks in the sequence but there must be no extra blanks at the end of the |
|---|
| 262 | terminated line. Note that a blank is not a valid symbol for a deletion. |
|---|
| 263 | <P> |
|---|
| 264 | The options are selected using an interactive menu. The menu looks like this: |
|---|
| 265 | <P> |
|---|
| 266 | <TABLE><TR><TD BGCOLOR=white> |
|---|
| 267 | <PRE> |
|---|
| 268 | |
|---|
| 269 | Penny algorithm for DNA, version 3.6a3 |
|---|
| 270 | branch-and-bound to find all most parsimonious trees |
|---|
| 271 | |
|---|
| 272 | Settings for this run: |
|---|
| 273 | H How many groups of 100 trees: 1000 |
|---|
| 274 | F How often to report, in trees: 100 |
|---|
| 275 | S Branch and bound is simple? Yes |
|---|
| 276 | O Outgroup root? No, use as outgroup species 1 |
|---|
| 277 | T Use Threshold parsimony? No, use ordinary parsimony |
|---|
| 278 | W Sites weighted? No |
|---|
| 279 | M Analyze multiple data sets? No |
|---|
| 280 | I Input sequences interleaved? Yes |
|---|
| 281 | 0 Terminal type (IBM PC, ANSI, none)? (none) |
|---|
| 282 | 1 Print out the data at start of run No |
|---|
| 283 | 2 Print indications of progress of run Yes |
|---|
| 284 | 3 Print out tree Yes |
|---|
| 285 | 4 Print out steps in each site No |
|---|
| 286 | 5 Print sequences at all nodes of tree No |
|---|
| 287 | 6 Write out trees onto tree file? Yes |
|---|
| 288 | |
|---|
| 289 | Are these settings correct? (type Y or the letter for one to change) |
|---|
| 290 | |
|---|
| 291 | </PRE> |
|---|
| 292 | </TD></TR></TABLE> |
|---|
| 293 | <P> |
|---|
| 294 | The user either types "Y" (followed, of course, by a carriage-return) |
|---|
| 295 | if the settings shown are to be accepted, or the letter or digit corresponding |
|---|
| 296 | to an option that is to be changed. |
|---|
| 297 | <P> |
|---|
| 298 | The options O, T, W, M, and 0 are the usual ones. They are described in the |
|---|
| 299 | main documentation file of this package. Option I is the same as in |
|---|
| 300 | other molecular sequence programs and is described in the documentation file |
|---|
| 301 | for the sequence programs. |
|---|
| 302 | <P> |
|---|
| 303 | The T (threshold) option allows a continuum of methods |
|---|
| 304 | between parsimony and compatibility. Thresholds less than or equal to 1.0 do |
|---|
| 305 | not have any meaning and should |
|---|
| 306 | not be used: they will result in a tree dependent only on the input |
|---|
| 307 | order of species and not at all on the data! |
|---|
| 308 | <P> |
|---|
| 309 | The W (Weights) option allows only weights of 0 or 1. |
|---|
| 310 | <P> |
|---|
| 311 | The M (Multiple data sets) option for this program does not allow multiple |
|---|
| 312 | sets of weights. We hope to change this soon. |
|---|
| 313 | <P> |
|---|
| 314 | The options H, F, and S are not found in the other molecular sequence programs. |
|---|
| 315 | H (How many) allows the user to set the quantity howmany, which we have |
|---|
| 316 | already seen controls number of times that the program |
|---|
| 317 | will report on its progress. F allows the user to set the quantity howoften, |
|---|
| 318 | which sets how often it will report -- after scanning how many trees. |
|---|
| 319 | <P> |
|---|
| 320 | The S (Simple) option alters a step in DNAPENNY which reconsiders the |
|---|
| 321 | order in which species are added to the tree. Normally the decision as to |
|---|
| 322 | what species to add to the tree next is made as the first tree is being |
|---|
| 323 | constructed; that ordering of species is not altered subsequently. The S |
|---|
| 324 | option causes it to be continually reconsidered. This will probably |
|---|
| 325 | result in a substantial increase in run time, but on some data sets of |
|---|
| 326 | intermediate messiness it may help. It is included in case it might prove |
|---|
| 327 | of use on some data sets. |
|---|
| 328 | <P> |
|---|
| 329 | Output is standard: if option 1 is toggled on, the data is printed out, |
|---|
| 330 | with the convention that "." means "the same as in the first species". |
|---|
| 331 | Then comes a list of equally parsimonious trees, and (if option 2 is |
|---|
| 332 | toggled on) a table of the |
|---|
| 333 | number of changes of state required in each character. If option 5 is toggled |
|---|
| 334 | on, a table is printed |
|---|
| 335 | out after each tree, showing for each branch whether there are known to be |
|---|
| 336 | changes in the branch, and what the states are inferred to have been at the |
|---|
| 337 | top end of the branch. If the inferred state is a "?" or one of the IUB |
|---|
| 338 | ambiguity symbols, there will be multiple |
|---|
| 339 | equally-parsimonious assignments of states; the user must work these out for |
|---|
| 340 | themselves by hand. A "?" in the reconstructed states means that in |
|---|
| 341 | addition to one or more bases, a deletion may or may not be present. If |
|---|
| 342 | option 6 is left in its default state the trees |
|---|
| 343 | found will be written to a tree file, so that they are available to be used |
|---|
| 344 | in other programs. |
|---|
| 345 | <P> |
|---|
| 346 | <HR><H3>TEST DATA SET</H3> |
|---|
| 347 | <P> |
|---|
| 348 | <TABLE><TR><TD BGCOLOR=white> |
|---|
| 349 | <PRE> |
|---|
| 350 | 8 6 |
|---|
| 351 | Alpha1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 352 | Alpha2 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 353 | Beta1 AAGGGG |
|---|
| 354 | Beta2 AAGGGG |
|---|
| 355 | Gamma1 AGGAAG |
|---|
| 356 | Gamma2 AGGAAG |
|---|
| 357 | Delta GGAGGA |
|---|
| 358 | Epsilon GGAAAG |
|---|
| 359 | </PRE> |
|---|
| 360 | </TD></TR></TABLE> |
|---|
| 361 | <P> |
|---|
| 362 | <HR> |
|---|
| 363 | <H3>CONTENTS OF OUTPUT FILE (if all numerical options are on)</H3> |
|---|
| 364 | <P> |
|---|
| 365 | <TABLE><TR><TD BGCOLOR=white> |
|---|
| 366 | <PRE> |
|---|
| 367 | |
|---|
| 368 | Penny algorithm for DNA, version 3.6a3 |
|---|
| 369 | branch-and-bound to find all most parsimonious trees |
|---|
| 370 | |
|---|
| 371 | |
|---|
| 372 | requires a total of 8.000 |
|---|
| 373 | |
|---|
| 374 | 9 trees in all found |
|---|
| 375 | |
|---|
| 376 | |
|---|
| 377 | |
|---|
| 378 | |
|---|
| 379 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 380 | ! |
|---|
| 381 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 382 | ! +--3 |
|---|
| 383 | ! +--7 +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 384 | 1 ! ! |
|---|
| 385 | ! +-----6 +-----Gamma2 |
|---|
| 386 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 387 | ! +--4 +--------Gamma1 |
|---|
| 388 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 389 | ! ! ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 390 | +--2 +-----------5 |
|---|
| 391 | ! +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 392 | ! |
|---|
| 393 | +-----------------Alpha2 |
|---|
| 394 | |
|---|
| 395 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 396 | |
|---|
| 397 | |
|---|
| 398 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 399 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 400 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 401 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 402 | |
|---|
| 403 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 404 | |
|---|
| 405 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 406 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 407 | 1 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 408 | 2 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 409 | 4 6 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 410 | 6 7 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 411 | 7 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 412 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 413 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 414 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 415 | 6 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 416 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 417 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 418 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 419 | 2 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 420 | |
|---|
| 421 | |
|---|
| 422 | |
|---|
| 423 | |
|---|
| 424 | |
|---|
| 425 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 426 | ! |
|---|
| 427 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 428 | ! +-----3 |
|---|
| 429 | ! ! +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 430 | 1 +-----6 |
|---|
| 431 | ! ! ! +--Gamma2 |
|---|
| 432 | ! ! +-----7 |
|---|
| 433 | ! +--4 +--Gamma1 |
|---|
| 434 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 435 | ! ! ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 436 | +--2 +-----------5 |
|---|
| 437 | ! +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 438 | ! |
|---|
| 439 | +-----------------Alpha2 |
|---|
| 440 | |
|---|
| 441 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 442 | |
|---|
| 443 | |
|---|
| 444 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 445 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 446 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 447 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 448 | |
|---|
| 449 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 450 | |
|---|
| 451 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 452 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 453 | 1 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 454 | 2 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 455 | 4 6 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 456 | 6 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 457 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 458 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 459 | 6 7 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 460 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 461 | 7 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 462 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 463 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 464 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 465 | 2 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 466 | |
|---|
| 467 | |
|---|
| 468 | |
|---|
| 469 | |
|---|
| 470 | |
|---|
| 471 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 472 | ! |
|---|
| 473 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 474 | ! +--3 |
|---|
| 475 | ! +--6 +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 476 | 1 ! ! |
|---|
| 477 | ! +-----7 +-----Gamma1 |
|---|
| 478 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 479 | ! +--4 +--------Gamma2 |
|---|
| 480 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 481 | ! ! ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 482 | +--2 +-----------5 |
|---|
| 483 | ! +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 484 | ! |
|---|
| 485 | +-----------------Alpha2 |
|---|
| 486 | |
|---|
| 487 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 488 | |
|---|
| 489 | |
|---|
| 490 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 491 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 492 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 493 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 494 | |
|---|
| 495 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 496 | |
|---|
| 497 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 498 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 499 | 1 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 500 | 2 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 501 | 4 7 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 502 | 7 6 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 503 | 6 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 504 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 505 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 506 | 6 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 507 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 508 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 509 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 510 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 511 | 2 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 512 | |
|---|
| 513 | |
|---|
| 514 | |
|---|
| 515 | |
|---|
| 516 | |
|---|
| 517 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 518 | ! |
|---|
| 519 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 520 | ! +--3 |
|---|
| 521 | 1 +--7 +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 522 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 523 | ! +--------6 +-----Gamma2 |
|---|
| 524 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 525 | ! ! +--------Gamma1 |
|---|
| 526 | +--2 |
|---|
| 527 | ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 528 | ! +--5 |
|---|
| 529 | +-----------4 +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 530 | ! |
|---|
| 531 | +-----Alpha2 |
|---|
| 532 | |
|---|
| 533 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 534 | |
|---|
| 535 | |
|---|
| 536 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 537 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 538 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 539 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 540 | |
|---|
| 541 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 542 | |
|---|
| 543 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 544 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 545 | 1 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 546 | 2 6 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 547 | 6 7 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 548 | 7 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 549 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 550 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 551 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 552 | 6 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 553 | 2 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 554 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 555 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 556 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 557 | 4 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 558 | |
|---|
| 559 | |
|---|
| 560 | |
|---|
| 561 | |
|---|
| 562 | |
|---|
| 563 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 564 | ! |
|---|
| 565 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 566 | ! +-----3 |
|---|
| 567 | 1 ! +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 568 | ! +--------6 |
|---|
| 569 | ! ! ! +--Gamma2 |
|---|
| 570 | ! ! +-----7 |
|---|
| 571 | +--2 +--Gamma1 |
|---|
| 572 | ! |
|---|
| 573 | ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 574 | ! +--5 |
|---|
| 575 | +-----------4 +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 576 | ! |
|---|
| 577 | +-----Alpha2 |
|---|
| 578 | |
|---|
| 579 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 580 | |
|---|
| 581 | |
|---|
| 582 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 583 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 584 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 585 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 586 | |
|---|
| 587 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 588 | |
|---|
| 589 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 590 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 591 | 1 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 592 | 2 6 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 593 | 6 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 594 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 595 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 596 | 6 7 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 597 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 598 | 7 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 599 | 2 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 600 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 601 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 602 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 603 | 4 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 604 | |
|---|
| 605 | |
|---|
| 606 | |
|---|
| 607 | |
|---|
| 608 | |
|---|
| 609 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 610 | ! |
|---|
| 611 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 612 | ! +--3 |
|---|
| 613 | 1 +--6 +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 614 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 615 | ! +--------7 +-----Gamma1 |
|---|
| 616 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 617 | ! ! +--------Gamma2 |
|---|
| 618 | +--2 |
|---|
| 619 | ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 620 | ! +--5 |
|---|
| 621 | +-----------4 +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 622 | ! |
|---|
| 623 | +-----Alpha2 |
|---|
| 624 | |
|---|
| 625 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 626 | |
|---|
| 627 | |
|---|
| 628 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 629 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 630 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 631 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 632 | |
|---|
| 633 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 634 | |
|---|
| 635 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 636 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 637 | 1 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 638 | 2 7 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 639 | 7 6 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 640 | 6 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 641 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 642 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 643 | 6 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 644 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 645 | 2 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 646 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 647 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 648 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 649 | 4 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 650 | |
|---|
| 651 | |
|---|
| 652 | |
|---|
| 653 | |
|---|
| 654 | |
|---|
| 655 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 656 | ! |
|---|
| 657 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 658 | ! +--3 |
|---|
| 659 | ! +--7 +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 660 | 1 ! ! |
|---|
| 661 | ! +--6 +-----Gamma2 |
|---|
| 662 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 663 | ! +-----2 +--------Gamma1 |
|---|
| 664 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 665 | +--4 +-----------Alpha2 |
|---|
| 666 | ! |
|---|
| 667 | ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 668 | +--------------5 |
|---|
| 669 | +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 670 | |
|---|
| 671 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 672 | |
|---|
| 673 | |
|---|
| 674 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 675 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 676 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 677 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 678 | |
|---|
| 679 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 680 | |
|---|
| 681 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 682 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 683 | 1 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 684 | 4 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 685 | 2 6 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 686 | 6 7 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 687 | 7 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 688 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 689 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 690 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 691 | 6 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 692 | 2 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 693 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 694 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 695 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 696 | |
|---|
| 697 | |
|---|
| 698 | |
|---|
| 699 | |
|---|
| 700 | |
|---|
| 701 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 702 | ! |
|---|
| 703 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 704 | ! +-----3 |
|---|
| 705 | ! ! +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 706 | 1 +--6 |
|---|
| 707 | ! ! ! +--Gamma2 |
|---|
| 708 | ! +-----2 +-----7 |
|---|
| 709 | ! ! ! +--Gamma1 |
|---|
| 710 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 711 | +--4 +-----------Alpha2 |
|---|
| 712 | ! |
|---|
| 713 | ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 714 | +--------------5 |
|---|
| 715 | +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 716 | |
|---|
| 717 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 718 | |
|---|
| 719 | |
|---|
| 720 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 721 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 722 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 723 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 724 | |
|---|
| 725 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 726 | |
|---|
| 727 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 728 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 729 | 1 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 730 | 4 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 731 | 2 6 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 732 | 6 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 733 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 734 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 735 | 6 7 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 736 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 737 | 7 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 738 | 2 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 739 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 740 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 741 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 742 | |
|---|
| 743 | |
|---|
| 744 | |
|---|
| 745 | |
|---|
| 746 | |
|---|
| 747 | +--------------------Alpha1 |
|---|
| 748 | ! |
|---|
| 749 | ! +--Delta |
|---|
| 750 | ! +--3 |
|---|
| 751 | ! +--6 +--Epsilon |
|---|
| 752 | 1 ! ! |
|---|
| 753 | ! +--7 +-----Gamma1 |
|---|
| 754 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 755 | ! +-----2 +--------Gamma2 |
|---|
| 756 | ! ! ! |
|---|
| 757 | +--4 +-----------Alpha2 |
|---|
| 758 | ! |
|---|
| 759 | ! +--Beta2 |
|---|
| 760 | +--------------5 |
|---|
| 761 | +--Beta1 |
|---|
| 762 | |
|---|
| 763 | remember: this is an unrooted tree! |
|---|
| 764 | |
|---|
| 765 | |
|---|
| 766 | steps in each site: |
|---|
| 767 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|---|
| 768 | *----------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 769 | 0| 1 1 1 2 2 1 |
|---|
| 770 | |
|---|
| 771 | From To Any Steps? State at upper node |
|---|
| 772 | |
|---|
| 773 | 1 AAGAAG |
|---|
| 774 | 1 Alpha1 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 775 | 1 4 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 776 | 4 2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 777 | 2 7 yes AGGAAG |
|---|
| 778 | 7 6 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 779 | 6 3 yes GGAAAG |
|---|
| 780 | 3 Delta yes GGAGGA |
|---|
| 781 | 3 Epsilon no GGAAAG |
|---|
| 782 | 6 Gamma1 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 783 | 7 Gamma2 no AGGAAG |
|---|
| 784 | 2 Alpha2 no AAGAAG |
|---|
| 785 | 4 5 yes AAGGGG |
|---|
| 786 | 5 Beta2 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 787 | 5 Beta1 no AAGGGG |
|---|
| 788 | |
|---|
| 789 | |
|---|
| 790 | </PRE> |
|---|
| 791 | </TD></TR></TABLE> |
|---|
| 792 | </BODY> |
|---|
| 793 | </HTML> |
|---|